On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, at 2:31 PM, mabi wrote:
> Ah ok so standard CentOS would do it... I guess I missed the point, I
> thought Atomic Host is THE distribution to go with when using such
> platforms like okd.io/OpenShift...
An interesting topic here is whether saying "Fedora/CentOS/RHEL" means *not*
{Fedora, CentOS, RHEL} Atomic Host. I don't think so; or to avoid double
negatives, I think Atomic/CoreOS style systems are part of the family.
Now, your question gets to a larger problem we've struggled with around
OpenShift/Kubernetes and platform choices and how we manage things. If you've
noticed for OpenShift 4.0 we're doing something fundamentally different here
with Red Hat CoreOS by baking in the kubelet/cri-o to the host directly.
Some people often forget that the rpm-ostree technology underlying Atomic Host
has package layering; I briefly went to the https://cri-o.io/ web page but the
link it has for CentOS RPMs is wrong as far as I can tell. But if the RPMs
exist it almost certainly works to do `rpm-ostree install cri-o`. But really
this is more about OKD.
