On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > Jason, KB, etc.: > > This is the beginning of last month's announcement: > > An updated version of [CentOS Atomic > Host](https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) > (tree version 7.20170428), is > now available ... > > And this is this month's: > > An updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (tree version 7.1705), is now > available[1]. CentOS Atomic Host is a lean operating system designed to > run ... > > See the problem here? How is a user supposed to keep track of upgrades?
We did change the versioning, I should have mentioned it in the message. It's not inconsistent, though, in that both are date-based, the last indicates Apr 2017, this one indicates May 2017. We talked about this in our last SIG meeting -- the rest of centos revs monthly, with this same major-version.YYMM scheme, and we've switched to that scheme for CentOS Atomic. Our images have actually carried this 1705, 1704, 1703 number for quite a while now, and this should make it easier for users to match up images with the version of the tree they contain. > > -- > -- > Josh Berkus > Project Atomic > Red Hat OSAS >
