On 06/15/2017 02:37 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 06/14/2017 06:59 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:40 PM Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com >> <mailto:jber...@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> All: >> >> In this week's Atomic Community Meeting, we voted to shut down >> ask.projectatomic.io <http://ask.projectatomic.io>. There's two >> parts to this: >> >> 1. Us being ready to take questions on StackExchange/StackOverflow. >> >> 2. Actually disabling the page and redirecting people. >> >> For the first part, that means I need as many Atomic contributors as >> possible to sign up for both StackOverflow and >> unix.stackexchange.com <http://unix.stackexchange.com>. >> Once there, I need you all to do the following things: >> >> >> Serverfault.com seems more appropriate for Atomic. (I believe they're >> all part of the same network, but you have to log in separately once >> you've set up an account, IIRC.) >> >> Serverfault has a fair number of Atomic questions. > > Joined. > > Do we want to push ServerFault, though? I ask because of the three, > ServerFault seems to have comparatively poor googleability. > > On the other hand, the number of existing questions there around Atomic > Host dwarfs the other two platforms, so maybe we do.
I was mistaken. I'm getting a lot of full-text hits for "atomic" and "host" separately; there are, in fact, relatively few questions about atomic host. > > I'm asking because I want to have *one* site that we recommend to users. > We'll troll for questions on all three sites, of course. > -- -- Josh Berkus Project Atomic Red Hat OSAS