On Jun 1, 2017 17:58, "Colin Walters" <walt...@verbum.org> wrote:
I've seen some interesting work on CRI-O for Kube/OpenShift. But I'm wondering about what people are thinking the future of docker.service and /usr/bin/docker is (particularly for Atomic Host). The particular intersection with AH is handling container storage; AIUI right now you can't have CRI-O and Docker share the same storage pool. So...should a CRI-O installer `systemctl stop docker.service; systemctl mask docker.service` and reuse the partition we've set up for /var/lib/docker? Or do we expect people to set up a separate partition? (It feels like the answer is probably "both") CRI-O can't actually use the Docker storage transparently. Either you use skopeo to copy images from Docker to cri-o storage or you start from scratch. Perhaps in the big picture for the single-node case we point people at `oc cluster up` etc? (Which itself should be a system container probably to avoid the obvious bootstrapping problem?)