On 01/12/2017 09:37 AM, Jerry Zhang wrote:
There's 2 parts to the answer, the container *image* itself in the upstream
repo is built off fedora. But I believe there are rhel/centos based images
in the RH registry.
The containers are host-specific, but for etcd and flannel, I've tested
them to work on fedora/centos/rhel and atomic host variants. Docker
is split into fedora and centos host specific versions, but those are
not fully working/tested at this time.
Ack, just checking because, it is my strong preference that we have ALL
RHEL system container images on RHCC...
Hope that helps!
Thanks,
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott McCarty" <smcca...@redhat.com>
To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 8:59:36 AM
Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] System container images in projectatomic docker hub
Dumb question. Are these CentOS/Fedora images? Not RHEL right?
On 01/12/2017 08:44 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:32:41PM -0800, Jason Brooks wrote:
I think it would be worth getting these into fedora's layered build
system, too.
+1000!
Then, they'll end up at the registry Randy Barlow is working on, and
also pushed to Docker Hub as part of that process.
--
Scott McCarty, RHCA
Technical Product Marketing: Containers
Email: smcca...@redhat.com
Phone: 312-660-3535
Cell: 330-807-1043
Web: http://crunchtools.com
When should you split your application into multiple containers?
http://red.ht/22xKw9i
--
Scott McCarty, RHCA
Technical Product Marketing: Containers
Email: smcca...@redhat.com
Phone: 312-660-3535
Cell: 330-807-1043
Web: http://crunchtools.com
When should you split your application into multiple containers?
http://red.ht/22xKw9i
