On 01/06/2017 11:24 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:16:45PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: >> So, I've done some testing, thanks to Dusty's setup. >> >> I wasn't able to test on Kubernetes because of some setup issues. >> However, I hammered away at Docker using some IO-intensive applications, >> including PostgreSQL and Etcd, both of which write data frequently to >> some unexpected places. >> >> So far I haven't seen any unexpected IO errors from containers running >> under overlayfs. >> >> And having all of storage be one big volume is really nice; it >> eliminates a longstanding issue we've had with disk allocation; the >> whole disk is simply available. >> >> So +1 on moving to overlayfs for F26. > > Nice to hear that Josh. BTW, on fedora server and atomic, overlay storage > will still come from non-root fs partition. That will allow one to switch > back to devicemapper if overlay2 does not work for them.
Why? It didn't when I just ran the test. Why can't we have a shared partition? -- -- Josh Berkus Project Atomic Red Hat OSAS
