On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:22:26PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Given all of the changes in the platform, it's time to rewrite and >> re-organize the Atomic Host documentation. Here's what I'm thinking for >> structure: >> >> >> * Introduction >> * Installation >> * Vagrant >> * Public Cloud >> * ISO >> * Others > > "ISO" is kind of an odd one out, since it's install media rather than > an environment. Maybe "On Hardware or Virtual Machines" or something > like that? > > >> 1) Should these be combined Fedora/CentOS docs, or should we make a >> "build" for each OS? > > I think maybe separate with clear interlinking....
+1 >> 2) Where should these live? projectatomic.io or RTD? > > ... oh, except in either of those cases, combined, not separate. :) +1 as well. I am a fan of RTD. I think it would make sense to have projectatomic.io as the main entry site, marketing, and blog location while the general docs would be linked off to RTD. >> 3) Is Vagrant really where we want to direct people as a quickstart >> option? I'm asking because I'm not that clear on what users can *do* >> with an single atomic node on vagrant. > > Maybe a vagrant multi-machine setup? > https://www.vagrantup.com/docs/multi-machine/ +1. We are using multi-machine in Commissaire and it works well. -- Thanks, Steve Milner Atomic | Red Hat | http://projectatomic.io/
