On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 11/22/2016 04:25 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 11/22/2016 02:59 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: >>>> I'd like to start a projectatomic repo for fedora/centos kube >>>> dockerfiles, and I'd like to build them under the projectatomic docker >>>> hub namespace. >>>> >>>> This is my test repo: https://github.com/jasonbrooks/k8s-images. I >>>> have branches for centos and for f25, and I've built docker images >>>> associated with these in my dockerhub namespace: >>>> https://hub.docker.com/r/jasonbrooks/. >>>> >>>> These docker files are based on the ones in CentOS-Dockerfiles, >>>> (https://github.com/CentOS/CentOS-Dockerfiles/tree/master/kubernetes). >>>> Fedora-dockerfiles is sort of in flux right now, so it seems that >>>> projectatomic ought to be a good place to collab on these / build / >>>> distribute these. >>>> >>>> The fedora versions of the files are pulling kube 1.4.5 from >>>> updates-testing. The centos versions are pulling an el7 build of those >>>> same packages from my copr >>>> (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jasonbrooks/kubernetes/). I'm >>>> going to work on getting these into the centos build system. >>>> >>>> Jason >>>> >>> Are these system containers? We currently have a repo for these type of >>> Dockerfiles. >>> >>> https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-system-containers >> These are regular containers at this point > Interesting question of whether some of them should be. I think we > should look at combining them into this > containers pool and perhaps renaming them to just system-containers or > containers. Rather then just > throwing more repos all over Atomic. The current goals with system > containers is to be able to run apps > on an atomic host. These apps usually extend the host system. For > example we want to be able to remove > etcd, flanneld, docker and k8s from atomic host and have them only run > in containers. Since we want > well defined ordering we want to let systemd control the setup of these > containers. They use runc out of > a systemd unit file. Some of your containers could probably be > extended to do the same thing rather then > just running them as docker containers. But the framework should be > able to support running these containers > in either way.
That works for me. I'll send a pr
