That's being said I would recommend real systemd for fat containers like
freeipa

https://github.com/adelton/docker-freeipa

IMHO dumb-init is meant to replace /start.sh (making it dumb-init
/start.sh) not to replace systemd.

My quesion is oneway.c properly written and safe and do what I expect it to
do?

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016, 9:22 PM Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 09/06/2016 02:16 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>
> I only want two processes
>
> confd and my application (apache or php-fpm or node . or uwsgi ...)
>
> The role of confd is to watch etcd/consul and update config when needed.
>
> I guess systemd is overkill for such simple thing (I don't want  ttys,
> crons, dbus, journald....)
>
> systemd in a container would just run journald as well as systemd, not
> much more unless you tell it to.
> Having journald would allow you to catch messages that httpd writes to
> syslog, but fine.
>
> Apache is a well-established and it have a way to drop privileges but this
> is not the case with "node ."
>
> I'm not sure about k8s no new priv.
> Ex. I want confd as root and node as app.
>
> I guess apache does not have nnp option.
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016, 9:05 PM Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> A couple of things.  1 you could use real systemd rather then using some
>> other init system.
>>
>> Secondly and perhaps conflicting, is why not run apache as non root to
>> start rather then dropping
>>
>> privs.  Apache will run perfectly fine without requiring root privs.
>> Also you could set the NO_NEW_PRIVS
>>
>> right in docker/k8s.
>>
>>
>> On 09/06/2016 01:46 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Typical fictional unicorn containers should have one process
>> >
>> > On practice it's actually processes of one concern ex. Apache
>> >
>> > One issue is that your entry point /start.sh should exec to replace
>> > the shell (so that application process would recieve signals)
>> >
>> > Since start.sh is pid 1 it has the responsibility to handle zombies.
>> > For this we can use yelp's dumb-init (which is almost to be pushed to
>> > official repo and already in copr)
>> >
>> > https://github.com/Yelp/dumb-init
>> >
>> > Typically our start.sh start confd in background using nohup
>> >
>> > Then I exec my application but I would like to drop privileges, first
>> > I used exec sudo or exec su but it wont replace the proces.
>> >
>> > I wrote a simple application that drop groups , supplementary groups
>> > and user
>> >
>> > Not only that but also it can optionally set
>> > PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS with prctl
>> > So that it will never get more privileges even with sudo/su.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > https://github.com/muayyad-alsadi/oneway/blob/master/README.md
>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to