FWIW: I think the logic on the RHEL side was that we don't want to make it look different - it's a different deployment format of the same OS...
D. On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephen Milner <smil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Jul 28, 2016 10:48 AM, "Waldemar Augustyn" <walde...@astyn.com> wrote: > > > > It's a minor point but I wonder if /etc/os-release should mention atomic > > somewhere. It's a different OS from centos/fedora listed now. Right > > now I am checking rpm-ostree to tell atomic from standard centos/fedora. > > > > Agreed. I believe that Jonathan Lebon is already working on adding it in. > > -- > Thanks, > Steve > -- Daniel Riek <r...@redhat.com> * Sr. Director Systems Design & Engineering * Red Hat Inc, Tel. +1-617-863-6776
