On 07/13/2016 10:24 AM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote: > On Jul 13, 2016 11:53 AM, "Josh Berkus" <jber...@redhat.com > <mailto:jber...@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> I'd like to replace Registry on the home page, because (a) it's not new >> anymore and (b) it's not really ready to install if you're not using the >> rest of openshift. > > What do you mean? This is by far the newest tech on the site. The > current installation is very lean: 3 container services running under > docker.
Authentication doesn't work without OpenShift OAuth. I was under the impression that this was a known issue? If it's not, then we need to debug it. > Because of the split repo origin+cockpit nature of this project we rely > heavily on this web property as a landing page for the registry. > > Clearly we have some larger content issues that need to be addressed. I > just don't think replacing the registry with ??? helps. There's also the issue of "if we're going to have three top-level options for the time being, does Registry make sense as co-equal with Atomic Host and ADB". And I don't think it does. Possibly what we should have is: Atomic Host ADB Projects ... where the last goes to a page which lists everything. This is the eventual direction we're going in with a total redesign anyway. -- -- Josh Berkus Project Atomic Red Hat OSAS
