On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Vitor Lobo <loboc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello guys. > > > As a user of the Docker, I would like to discuss a better offer to the > Anaconda installer (inside the atomic project). Well, the anaconda project is > very interesting for both servers, and to desktop ' s. However, in the case > of server Docker, seem somewhat "unnecessary" the idea of manipulating > graphics and practical complexity and partitioning of anaconda.
Anaconda isn't in the atomic tree. You use it to install from an iso image, but once your system is up, and docker comes into play, anaconda isn't around at all. If you deploy from one of the cloud images, it never enters into the picture. I agree that a graphical installer isn't always desirable, but if you need to install to bare metal, you can use anaconda in text mode to avoid that. > > In my view, it would be productive to use something along the lines of Vmware > Photon (which is a distribution based on RedHat systems also). Basically > there's a package manager that is a variant of (dnf), the tdnf, and basically > everything is applied by systemd ... being a minimalist distribution. > > In fact, wich the need to use x11 e\ou wayland modules for this type of > server? Atomic really need this feature? Are questions, interesting > questions. Let's think of something more lightweight and goal? > > > -- > > Cell: (35) 992367502 // loboc...@gmail.com
