Yup, absolutely. Slimming down where we can is great - but I don't want people to get a bad impression with the core fedora image for sure.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 02/10/2016 12:42 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: >> >> Removing dnf would break most people who depend on fedora base images, >> since installing new packages is the reason people depend on the >> fedora base image. Creating a fedora base image would dnf is >> interesting as a side project (fedora-minimal?) but I doubt would ever >> see wide use in the community, because it would double or triple the >> amount of work someone has to do to actually use the image. It would >> appear to the user as if the fedora image is broken with very little >> explanation, and not fit the common use people have for OS base >> images. > > > Well, we can do without DNF and RPM for OStree-built images, no? > > -- > -- > Josh Berkus > Project Atomic > Red Hat OSAS
