On 2016-02-09 10:57, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:17:20AM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Is it worth considering holding 1.10 back until Fedora24?
We should do so by policy, if I understand correctly. This is not a
compatible change and users can't easily roll back. We should freeze
F23
on 1.10, and the two-week atomic releases should stick with 1.9 until
we
have given users adequate notice about this and 1.10 is adequately
tested.
One thing we *could* do is put it in updates testing in F23 but _never_
put it into stable there. That would allow people who want it to opt in
to that branch on F23 if they need it.
Great idea, I'd be one of the first to bite the bullet.
Another suggestion: a COPR repo (of the no warranty variant), if this is
likely to (re-)occur in the future.
--
Regards,
-- Jeroen
