The current swing at a Vagrant based doc is here: https://github.com/nzwulfin/atomic-site/blob/vagrant/source/docs/vagrant_installation.md
Could we have two Quick Starts depending on if they're > familiar with Vagrant or not? That's also another topic that came in the original discussion is how many X Guides at all levels to we need? Virtualbox vs Libvirt? Vagrant vs Adv Vagrant? Fedora vs Centos? Here's the discussion that happened on IRC a billion Internet years ago: https://gist.github.com/nzwulfin/022dc7438a8f43a999df Open to comments and questions On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan Lebon <jle...@redhat.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > > I agree and am claiming responsibility here. We have an arguably better > > experience available currently for Fedora Atomic via Vagrant. > > This is something that I've been trying to address with > Developer Mode as well, although I can see both of them > serving their purpose. E.g. Vagrant is much nicer if folks > are already set up for it, while Developer Mode is nice for > first timers who don't want that upfront investment of > setting up and learning Vagrant just to try out Atomic. > > > So, excuses aside, I'll put together a new Super Quick Start Guide > > highlighting the vagrant builds that Dusty and Jason have worked hard on > > putting together. > > Could we have two Quick Starts depending on if they're > familiar with Vagrant or not? Or would that be too confusing > to present? >
