Hi Matt, Your doc looks good. As FYI, in the somewhat near future (by the end of 2016) the storage clients will move inside Docker containers removing a need for them on host. I dont know if you want to mention that in the doc or not.
We added the packages to RHEL atomic as a stop gap while waiting for client-in-container feature. If I remember properly gluster was easy and RBD required a new ghost package to satisfy an init script dependency. The CEPH team was working to remove the dependency so it may no longer be an issue. -bc On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Matt Micene <nzwul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Proposed change text wiki page is here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AtomicStorageClients > > In a nutshell, to support Ceph and Gluster as options for Kubernetes > Persistent Volumes, the clients need to be available on the host. I'm > chasing down a few options at the moment, but the quick and easy way is to > add the packages into the compose list. I've got a line (from mmcgrath) on > an alternate option and will pursue it but no info on that right now. > > The GlusterFS client add 4 packages to the base. > > The Ceph is a bit larger, but there is an issue with the dependency list > that has already been reported and is being worked on to drop that number. > > This is my first Fedora Change, so edits, questions, and improvements > > Cheers, > - Matt M > >
