Hi all, adb-tests seems like the consensus name for the repo. Can we have this repo lifted from private to public?
On 11/21, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > adb-tests is somewhat limited as it implies tests of only the ADB component. > However there seems to be discussion around including Atomic App tests too. > > Should those be in separate repos? Should it be called atomic-tests? That > would also allow test plans for Atomic Host, Atomic CLI, etc. > > regards, > > bex > > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 11/10/2015 11:18 AM, Charlie Drage wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> The problem that we have at the moment is most of our testing scripts > >> / tools are located on personal Github user accounts. The context > >> being atomicapp as well as the eclipse CDK integrations being on > >> personal accounts.. Rather than searching everywhere, it would be prefered > >> to have a standardized place for functional test scripts / cdk testing. > >> Ideally a repo named "tests" as a catch-all. > >> > >> There has been a discussion on container-tools in relation to creating > >> a standardized repo: > >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/2015-November/msg00120.html > >> > >> Can a repo named "tests" be created on github.com/projectatomic/tests ? > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > > > > "tests" is a little generic for the top level of projectatomic. I think > > there may have been a proposal to call this "adb-tests" for now, which > > sounds reasonable. > > > > +1 - let's get this created. > > > > Dusty > > > > -- Charlie Drage Red Hat - OSAS Team / Project Atomic 4096R / 0x9B3B446C http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x622CDF119B3B446C
