David fire wrote: > > > 2009/1/12 Russell Brown <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Quoth Steve Murphy... > >Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0700 > > > >QUESTIONS: > > > >Which of the two would you see being useful to you? > > Obvious comment really but given LEG based CDR, one can determine the > 'Simple' data but you can't work it the other way. > > I'd therefore find LEG based CDR more useful as the granularity > (time on > Hold, in Queue, Waiting on pre-xfer ring etc etc) would be good. > > > -- > Regards, > Russell > > > hi > one question, i will need to rewrite all my apps that use the cdr? > and the queue_log will be rewrited? > thanks > I have found that it is easier to use queue events rather than the queue log, I have my own custom build of asterisk in which I send everything that would be written to the queue log to the AMI, and then I use a perl script that watches for those events and writes them to a DB. I would recommend doing something similar as it makes adapting to changes in the structure easier.
Anthony _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
