On 4/4/2023 4:26 PM, George Joseph wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 1:16 PM <aster...@phreaknet.org> wrote:
On 4/4/2023 2:53 PM, George Joseph wrote:
<snip>
* Is there any connection with reviews/PRs in progress? Suppose an
issue is open and maybe on the verge of being stale, but someone has
submitted a PR against. Changes can often take much longer than 3
weeks to merge, so it wouldn't make sense for an issue to close
itself in that case. So I'm concerned perhaps that might not be
sufficient time.
We're still thinking about the issues process but...
The action allows you to specify labels that make an issue exempt from
auto-closure. I was thinking that when a PR gets submitted, we'd look for
the "Resolves: #issuenum" tag in the commit message, then add an
"InProgress" label to the issue to prevent it from being auto closed. The
issue would then get closed when the PR is closed.
I'm also thinking it would only close issues that have been inactive and
assigned to the submitter. Like the "Waiting for Feedback" status in Jira.
Does that make sense?
That makes sense, that seems like it would replicate the current
behavior pretty nicely.
Thanks, George!
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
