:: On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:29:44 -0400 :: <calhpkamfghvmihxrqhw1esrs+ph8py_cudnms9pj6busg4s...@mail.gmail.com> :: K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I suppose that, since you're talking (ok, writing) about AFC, you're > > running ClamAV; now... are you using the extra signatures available > > from SaneSecurity ? I'm referring to > > > > http://sanesecurity.com/usage/signatures/ > We are using up to date clamav sigs. The problem is that these files > are encrypted so they're not being detected. Ok for the sigs being up-to-date; but my point was about the "extra" signatures offered by SaneSecurity, not the regular ones; I found that the regular signatures are often "behind" while the ones offered by SaneSecurity are faster to catch-up, so my suggestion was to add those signatures to your ClamAV scanner to help improve its efficiency; I've been using a number of signatures from SaneSecurity along with the regular clamav signatures and I found them to be quite effective at blocking "junk" (spam, malware and so on) that's why I'm suggesting to give them a spin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
