Have you suggested a SET command to control that at <https://ideas.ibm.com/>?
I just submitted Provide an equivalent to ISPF data shifts [INFRAVMLNX-I-2] there with URL <https://ideas.ibm.com/search?query=Provide+an+equivalent+to+ISPF+data+shifts+%5BINFRAVMLNX-I-2%5D>. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 1:03 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> Subject: Re: HLASM and VM (was RE: Using (0) to suppress alignment checks in HLASM) External Message: Use Caution On 9/8/25 10:42, Phil Smith III wrote: > "two kinds of shifts"? First and third? :) > ...Floor and steering column. The behavior of XEDIT I never became comfortable with was its scrolling to center a search target vertically where ISPF simply highlights it in place. The behavior of ISPF I never became comfortable with was its inability to wrap long lines, making INSERT characters extraordinarily cumbersome. No one should ever need more than 72 columns? -- gil
