On 9/6/25 12:07, Rob van der Heij wrote:
Yes, better than nothing. But by little.
I don't know whether John distributed the TSO Pipelines on 2010 level. I do
know IBM Denmark did it as PO until John retired. It contained several
things not in the batchpipes edition (which landed at IBM again later)
I think the concept with pipes between job steps was pretty cool,
...
Between job steps? Or between jobs?
o Has the Initiator the ability to run multiple steps concurrently?
o Or is this a *major* Type 1 enhancement added by Pipes?
o Or must the concurrent steps be in separate jobs?
What would the (pointless) illustration look like?
IEBGENER | IEBGENER
How are DDNAME conflicts handled? (two SYSUT1 and two SYSUT2?)
Possibly alternate DDNAME lists?
especially with CMS Pipelines in between. Those involved didn't understand
the potential of the solution.
Regular expressions?
--
gil
