Jim Mulder wrote, in part: >This bigger concern for programs that use STCK or STCKF is the TOD >clock wrap in September 2042....there is a lot of code in operating >systems, middleware, and probably applications, that needs to be >changed to use a different comparison technique before then.
Or we need to retire-that's my plan! Not that it likely affects many folks here, but on a zPDT or equivalent, STCKF is no faster than STCK in my testing. That's actually an improvement: a few years ago, STCKF was much *slower*. IBM fixed that.
