Nice article.

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Gopal Srinivasan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of Rahman and brand recalls
>
> Why is having A. R. Rahman as a brand endorser a tough undertaking?.
>
> Rahman is actually a difficult endorser. As a persona he comes through
> as one that shuns it all. Bringing such a persona to the forefront of
> advertising and branding could at times prove counter-productive.
>
> With music maestro A. R. Rahman winning many awards worldwide for his
> music, is it not time for brands to use him in their advertising, as a
> superstar?
>
> - S. K. Raman, Chennai
>
> Raman sir, I agree with you. A. R. Rahman has arrived on the firmament
> of music excellence with a big bang. The recognitions are just pouring
> in, quarter after quarter.
>
> There is really a state of under-use in the persona of Rahman as a
> brand endorser, as of now. The most visible one has been the one in
> which the now-defunct Worldspace Radio used him to optimal benefit and
> visibility norms.
>
> Rahman's Grammy is an acknowledgement of musical genius and hard work.
> I do believe it is all about the new fact that brilliance will find
> recognition, it does not matter which geography it resides in. India
> is a happening story as of now. It is about IT, ITES, Bollywood, music
> and more. And Rahman is the latest icon.
>
> Rahman as a brand endorser is something that is to be considered
> seriously now. Rahman is a brand in himself. It is important for this
> brand to associate with brands that actually add value to the Rahman
> brand rather than run in the pursuit of money and wide-spectrum
> endorsements. To that extent, Rahman's work with the now defunct
> Worldspace was an excellent fit. It added value to brand Rahman, and
> in return Rahman had a positive rub-off effect on brand Worldspace.
> The intelligent use of brand Rahman needs to be one of symbiotic use -
> categories reasonably umbilical to the genius in terms of music, or
> with categories that are all about excellence, rigour and perfection.
> A bit like the fit we saw with Tiger Woods and what Accenture wanted
> to say, until the recent events that rolled out.
>
> Keep one thing in mind, though. Rahman is actually a difficult
> endorser. As a persona he comes through as one that shuns it all.
> Bringing such a persona to the forefront of advertising and branding
> at times could prove counter-productive.
>
> Whichever brand uses Rahman needs to build a completely organic story
> of involvement. Nothing must appear forced. And that is a tough one.
>
> I do, therefore, believe that Rahman as a brand endorser will have
> limited cues and limited appeal altogether, and this, in many ways, is
> very good for Rahman. His image will remain intact, without being
> eaten into by the canker of brand endorsement that on many an occasion
> hurts and eats into the persona of the endorser.
>
> As far as price is concerned, I do believe he needs to demand a big
> price now. He needs to endorse very few brands, but he needs to milk
> the maximum value from those few brands.
>
> http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/catalyst/2010/02/25/stories/2010022550110400.htm
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Are you searching for a reason, to be kind?
> <b>
> Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Magic.
> Only at arrahmanfans.com - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community.
>
> Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com
> Admin: [email protected]
> To Subscribe: [email protected]
> To Unsubscribe: [email protected]! Groups Links
>
>
>
>



-- 
Anil

Reply via email to