i fully agree. but then may be boss should not do these type of projects where he has to compromise a lot for the sake of big budget or mass appeal. similar thing happened with Ghajini too. but still i must say given boss's post-Oscar image + huge budget/hype of project + Kylie etc etc, everyone expects him to come up with something extra-ordinary, something of his standards and at the same time mass-appealing. and chiggy wiggy is kind of a let down in that respect.
little off topic but true that song picturization is kinda lame. where's that all money they have put? the set, the costumes, the extras etc everything looks from an average budget film. and btw if he is uncle than she truly is aunti since years ago :) - Jahanzeb --- In [email protected], V S Rawat <vsra...@...> wrote: > > On 8/28/2009 1:39 PM India Time, _Matthew Islam_ wrote: > > > Trust this from someone who knows, the soundtrack is rocking enough > > within the bounds of the script!!! > > My hunch is also the same. "within the bounds of the script" is going to > be the key factor for the music of this film. When too much money gets > dumped in, people (producer/ director) shy away from taking risks, doing > experimentation, giving freedom to others in doing their work. ARR by > nature is a shy and sensitive man, he would sense this that he is > included in this project only because of his brand value and not for the > quality of his work. Kylie was roped in for the same reason. > > You just see how unimaginative is the choreography. Girl singing softly > and emotionally and the boy (rather uncle) jumps in with all hulla gulla > brouhaha. 100s of songs have followed this pattern (on screen). Even > some Shammi Kapoor B&W songs had better video than this. > -- > > btw, the film was supposed to be 100% underwater. Is that a submarine > discotheque or what? :-) > > -- > Rawat > > > > > Wait for it to come out and you will agree....... > > > > Dheeraj all......... > > > > TC, > > > > Matthew Islam >
