We will have ppl doin this i would say lets just Ignore dem SDM has 
given us reasons to rejoice and lets do dat.. 

--- In [email protected], Rahman Fan 
<balajiluvsmu...@...> wrote:
>
> Guyz... Your thoughts on this rubbish article please.... Im 
extremely disappointed with this article....
> 
> Link to this article: 
http://in.news.yahoo.com/48/20090224/1241/top-it-shouldn-t-have-
won.html
> 
> 
> "Frankly, I don't think Slumdog Millionaire deserved
> the Oscar for best film. And even more frankly, I don't think Resul
> Pookutty should have invoked "my country and my civilisation" in 
his
> acceptance speech for best sound mixing. India was not up there in 
the
> Kodak auditorium for approval. It was a British film financed by 
the
> indie subsidiary of an American studio which happened to be set in
> India and as a result they could not help but involve Indian actors
> (including Indian-origin Britishers) and shoot it in India. We 
crave
> too much for international recognition. A bit too much than is 
seemly.
> Even as all of us go around strutting, pretending to be a 
superpower.Other
> than Slumdog, I have seen only one film out of the other four
> nominated. But I've read about all of them. The one that I saw is 
The
> Reader. The subject is far more intellectually challenging, 
emotionally
> moving and morally disturbing than Slumdog can ever hope to be. Not
> since A Last Tango In Paris has nudity (both male and female) been 
so
> necessary to a film's narrative, and so non-titillating and so
> touching. A film which stretches over 30 years and with essentially
> only two characters, and yet a film that is as gripping as a 
thriller.
> It's a film that, as my friend told me, demands and requires to be 
seen
> in one sitting, with no interruption by commercials and visits to 
the
> loo.But look at the themes of the other movies that were
> nominated this year. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, the love
> story of a man who is born as an extreme geriatric and keeps 
getting
> younger and dies as a newborn. Only for a brief period of time are 
the
> man and his beloved around the same compatible age. Of course it's 
an
> impossible concept and completely unbelievable, but it's a high
> concept. Milk is about the first openly gay man to be elected to 
public
> office in the United States; Frost/Nixon about the first interview
> disgraced US President Richard Nixon gave, to has-been TV 
journalist
> David Frost. For both of them, it is a chance for redemption, for a
> somewhat sane life. These are all big themes. I am not doubting
> Slumdog's quality as a film in any way. Danny Boyle is one of the 
most
> talented directors around. But comparing Slumdog to The Reader is
> almost impossible. It's like comparing A Christmas Carol to Great
> Expectations.Scrooge won, little Pip lost. But that's the way it
> has been with the Oscars. Sometimes the nominations reflect the 
mood of
> America's liberals, sometimes the winners reflect political
> correctness. In 2006, the following five films were nominated: Good
> Night and Good Luck, Brokeback Mountain, Crash, Capote and Munich. 
Good
> Night and Good Luck is about a TV broadcaster who took on the
> McCarthyist witch hunt in the 1950s; essentially about freedom of 
the
> press. Brokeback Mountain deflated the entire mythology of uber-
macho
> frontiersmen by portraying a deep homosexual relationship between 
two
> cowboys. Crash interlinked several stories to study racism in all 
its
> forms and in startling ways. Capote was about the gay writer Truman
> Capote who travels to the South of the US to write a book on two
> multiple murderers. Munich told the story of the Israeli agents who
> hunted down the Black September terrorists who killed Israeli 
athletes
> during the Munich Olympics, and asked the question: To take 
revenge, do
> we become as base as the men who are our targets?There's a clear
> pattern: anger over the Iraq war, the stifling of the media, the
> stranglehold of neo-conservatism, the contempt for minorities. The
> denizens of Hollywood were simply reacting to their world as they 
saw
> it. The other major critically-acclaimed movies of that year were
> Transamerica, about one man's battle to change his gender, and 
Syriana,
> which told Americans that their nation's policies were largely
> responsible for Islamist terrorism.Then there's political
> correctness. Gandhi won Best Picture over ET. The Academy decided 
that
> the biopic of a great and influential leader was more "important" 
than
> the woes of a cute alien stranded on our planet. (This incensed 
Steven
> Spielberg so much that he decided to give the Academy 
the "important"
> films they felt comfortable with, and made The Colour Purple - 
which
> didn't win any Oscars - and Schindler's List - which raked them 
in.)
> Tom Hanks won his first best acting Oscar for Philadelphia, as 
much for
> his acting as for being the first major star to portray a gay man
> suffering from AIDS. In Hollywood, that's called "courage".So
> The Reader can't win. After all, its female protagonist is a former
> Auschwitz guard who let 300 Jews burn alive in a locked church. The
> film's position on morality is too nuanced for the general Academy
> member to grapple with with any success. But Kate Winslet can be 
given
> the award for best actress. By taking this controversial role and
> baring her body so naturally for the purposes of art, she has shown
> "courage". Milk is about homosexuality, so Sean Penn gets the 
statuette
> for "courage", but not the film. Benjamin Button, which was co-
produced
> by its star Brad Pitt, is probably seen as too much the case of an
> actor showing off, while being aided by more-than-state-of-the art
> visual effects. Frost/Nixon? Who's interested?So Slumdog has
> won, and we should really rejoice for the six children who acted 
in it,
> for they are the real stars of the film. We should rejoice for AR
> Rahman, though the music he has got his two Oscars for is not even 
of
> his average quality, forget his sublime and exhilarating stuff. 
But the
> Academy has decided. But I really think it's a bit too much if we 
take
> this as a victory for Indian cinema. It's a non-Indian film which
> happened to have an all-Indian cast. We shoot entire films abroad
> nowadays, especially in the US, remember?The writer is the editor 
of the RPG Group's soon-to-be-launched current affairs and features 
magazine, 'Open'.."
> RegdsBalaji R
> 
> 
> 
>       Check out the all-new Messenger 9.0! Go to 
http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/
>


Reply via email to