R ratings don't sink oscar chances........
some of the biggest winners have been R rated and infact the opposite is
true.........if the movie isn't gray and sometimes stupified, then that
hurts their chances of success........the oscar members hate fairy
tales.....exception being LOTR.

I have a strong feeling depending on other films making a late run that SDM
has solid oscar chances!

My two cents.....
Matt

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Gopal Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>   Slumdog Millionaire Gets Rated R?! What!?
> Posted on Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008 at 2:31 pm by: Peter Sciretta
> Danny Boyle's Slumdog Millionaire is the
> type of film that will have everyone leaving the theater with both
> tears and a smile. It's a beautiful film about first love, fate and
> destiny, and growing up in the slums of India. When I saw the film at
> the Telluride Film Festival last month, Alex from FirstShowing commented to
> me that the reason why there is no blood shown in a
> critical scene that involved a gun (not a spoiler, don't worry), is
> because the film will be released PG-13. And that reasoning made
> complete sense to me. There were a couple instances throughout the film
> when the camera cuts away before any graphic violence is show. There is
> no nudity (aside from a little kid running to the shower). It iss a
> film that would appeal huge to teen audiences, if Fox Searchlight could
> somehow trick them into buying a ticket. But apparently the MPAA thinks
> otherwise.
> The MPAA gave the film an R-Rating "for some violence, disturbing
> images and language." I call bullshit. Fox Searchlight should have
> taken this one to the appeal process. If Two-Face in The Dark Knight
> got a PG-13 rating, than Slumdog should have been awarded a PG. It's a
> shame that Searchlight didn't want to take the extra time to fight this
> one out. I'm guessing that Fox are more concerned with getting the
> rating on the posters as soon as possible, so that they can meet the
> November 12th release date. You see, Searchlight also has to market
> Darren Aronofsky's The Wrestler (out in December). And both films need
> to hit theaters by the end of the year for Award consideration.. They
> have given both films just enough separation to do so properly. But the
> lack of time before the release probably prevents an appeals process
> from happening. Just my own speculation. But it does make sense, right?
>
> http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/10/22/slumdog-millionaire-gets-rated-r-what/
>
> 'Slumdog Millionaire' Gets An R Rating, There Goes The All-Inclusive
> Feel-Good Vibe And Possible Oscar Nod?
> Danny Boyle's surprise hit of the year "Slumdog Millionaire," was pegged to
> corner the "Little Miss Sunshine"/"Juno" feel-good indie market this fall.
> Unfortunately it has been blind-sided by the MPAA which recently gave the
> film an R rating,
> which will most likely shut it out of the success that "Juno" enjoyed
> and potentially jeopardize its Oscar contention. The soccer-mom
> oriented MPAA must have been turned off by the gross non-white characters
> that
> dominated the film, and thought a movie set in the slums of India would
> just to be catastrophic if witnessed by the teens of America. 'Slumdog'
> has its tough moments, but is certainly in no way deserving of an
> R-Rating and a PG-13 at worst. It's practically a family, feel-good
> film! (but done by Boyle, it's still aces, and probably the most
> exhilarating film we saw the Toronto Film Festival).
>
> The company producing the film, Fox Searchlight, is apparently not going to
> go through the appeals process to challenge the rating since it wants to
> meet the November 12th release date. We hope this rating doesn't sink the
> already slim chances
> the film had of connecting with a mainstream audience, because the film
> certainly has an uphill battle in its near future and it's deserving of
> so much more.
>
>
> http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/2008/10/slumdog-millionaire-gets-r-rating-there.html
>
> SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE GETS SCREWED BY THE MPAA
> * By Devin Faraci
> * Published Yesterday
> * News
> *
> Last night I saw Danny Boyle's Slumdog Millionaire and
> was blown away. It's beautiful and romantic, sad and tragic, stunning
> and moving. It's a Dickensian classic that does the greatest thing
> cinema can do: it transports you into the life of someone else and lets
> you see and experience part of the world you would otherwise never
> know. And beyond all of that it's also compelling entertainment.
>
> It's
> also a movie that I would recommend for teens. It's tough in spots, so
> is life for the children of India's slums. Boyle doesn't flinch from
> the gritty, ugly aspects of grinding, serious poverty, but he also
> never rubs our faces in it. The film could serve as a way to help
> younger people understand the scope of extreme poverty in ways that
> Children's Aid commercials never can. And the movie's uplifting message
> of hope won't leave them depressed, but rather feeling that there's a
> way to change the world.
>
> So of course the MPAA gave the movie an
> R. This has happened again and again over the years - movies that are
> perfect for teens that don't whitewash the realities of the world get
> slapped with a restrictive rating that guarantees they can never see
> it. There's no nudity in Slumdog Millionaire,
> and there's no explicit sex. There's some violence. There's lots of
> tonally grim stuff. There's some harder language. But it's all true.
> Slumdog isn't a documentary, but the lack of reality doesn't change the
> basic truthfulness of the film.
>
> I'm
> disappointed that Fox Searchlight didn't make a bigger stink about this
> impending rating - the film deserves a PG-13 because it deserves to be
> seen by people 13 and older. If this was a book aimed at teens, it
> would be lauded for its truthfulness and educational value. Instead
> because this is a movie it gets slapped down with a rating that ensures
> it will never be as widely seen as it should be.
>
>
> http://chud.com/articles/articles/16755/1/SLUMDOG-MILLIONAIRE-GETS-SCREWED-BY-THE-MPAA/Page1.html
>
>  
>

Reply via email to