Also maybe cuz Gulzar penned both bidi jalayale and mayya mayya.

On 6/1/08, V S Rawat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   On 6/1/2008 9:23 AM India Time, _kishore parayath_ wrote:
>
> > Pls dont mention COPYCATS VISHAL-SEKHAR in this Holy Community......
> > They are disgusting..shameless creatures.... Whereas the name
> > Shankar-ehsaan-loy is very much deserving to be mentioned in this
> > community...They are good, genuine and committed composers......
> >
>
> k. done.
>
> I liked 2-3 songs of Om Shanti Om but have not bothered to know much
> about Vishal-Sekhar so I didn't even know that they have copied that music.
>
> SEL are indeed good in the new breed, but consistentcy and popularity is
> not there with them. A R Rahman had become a household name for Hindi
> music in some 3-4 years (Roza, Humse hai muqabla, Bombay, Rangeela), but
> SEL is now in some 10th year and has given some 20 films and some are
> indeed good, but if they has not become a household name, I think it is
> because their rate of improvement and innovation are quite slow. They
> should give more Dil Chahta hai stuff which has a soul soothing
> freshness. And while we are at DCH, let me mention that though I don't
> like Javed's lyrics much, still I smile everytime I listen to or
> remember his line from the film "Ishq ke Ghaat jo utartey hain." What a
> naughty line. Those who don't know, there is a hindi phrase, sort of
> idiom, "Maut ke ghaat utarna", so he twisted a word and put "Ishq" at
> the level of "maut" which migles so well in the love-is-stupidity
> persona of Aamir in this film. He should give more such things compared
> to the prose lectures he penned for Ye Taara, Wo Taara of Swades.
>
> --
> Still, when Mahendra Kapoor speaks about today's music being not good,
> he is basically wrong because even the copycats are also ending up
> giving hummable music because they copy from the music that was good and
> popular in original so the copy also becomes good. e.g. Anu Malik ended
> up giving good music in Gentleman stealing note by note from our man.
>
> --
> Rawat
>
> 
>

Reply via email to