for people telling ATm Sucks... I am sorry. Pls come to CHENNAI, SOUTH INDia
and then you will realise the greatness of the craze for ATM songs. FM
Radios are having a race to broadcast ATM songs .The more the number of
times, the songs from ATM are played, the more the people are listening. ATM
is the craze here in CHENNAI. People forgot the movie but not the songs ..

I know this from Radio sources itself.. Pls do not pass of comments without
knowing reality


On 2/6/08, mohd ariff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>    atm was created to strike chord with the masses whilst JA was created
> for the elite. thats why ATM was a success in audio sales.
>
> ariff
>
> *"Triply R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote:
>
>  Not sure who this was addressed to, but obviously
> being the guy who dissed ATM and said JA and MP were
> good, I assume it is addressed to me! Well, for one,
> yup, you can say I am super ignorant since I still
> feel ATM sucked. It may have gotten better reviews
> than JA but heck, every review is just an opinion. The
> original email was that JA was another MP and we
> should enjoy ATM instead, implying that JA was bad and
> MP was bad and ATM was good. I felt otherwise and I
> have said so. You can chalk me saying that no one
> remembers ATM now to being super ignorant, but there
> is no denying the fact that once the movie tanked very
> little was written even about the audio.
>
> In a sense it is similar to MP, once the movie tanked
> the music was never heard of again. But, just like I
> still love MP, more than so called "better" Rahman
> albums, I guess some people do prefer ATM. I consent
> that but I was responding to the flavour of the
> original post, which in essence was like "this sucks".
> I just said "no, THIS sucks"!!. Once the "facts" are
> presented, I consent that you are right, but only
> insofar as that ATM was a hit album. The music still
> sucks and not one song is worth it. Quite unlike MP,
> where everything rocked, with the exception of maybe
> one song, which could have been better.
>
> Triply.
>
> "Well, that's like.. just your opinion man"
> -The Dude from "The Big Lebowski"
>
> --- Dinesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <dinesh.theboss%40hotmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > Just to justify ur like for Mangal & JA doesnt mean
> > u can go on
> > bashing ATM, for ur KIND information, ATM album was
> > 1 of the biggest
> > hit ALBUM last year in Tamil, infact it did more
> > wonders than Sivaji
> > audio. unless ur being super ignorant, then i have
> > no idea. well, yea,
> > even i enjoyed ATM more than JA. its been quite
> > sometime ive placed JA
> > songs in my playlist but ATM songs r alwiz there. So
> > what now?
> >
> > ok fine, JA & ATM r focused for a diff set of
> > audience, 100 % agreed.
> > Did u know ATM had some great experimental numbers,
> > just like JA. ATM
> > is no inferior to JA, Mind you!! listen to
> > Valayapathi, an excellent
> > mixure of classical & folk.if ur not a fan of both
> > the genre,then im
> > so sorry!! Keelamal, i have not seen anyone dislike
> > this song.
> > Madhuraike Pogathedi simply an excellent folkish
> > number which ARR USED
> > to provide us back in 1990s, and he hasnt lost his
> > touch a single %!
> > Marylin Monroe Cloninga, another peppy number, with
> > AMAZING tune,
> > loved the tune allot...very very catchy. Ponmagal
> > Vanthal remix?
> > though im not a fan of it, it rocked the WHOLE tamil
> > nation.
> >
> > now, ATM faced less bashing from reviewers compared
> > to JA. so can we
> > say ATM faced more success than JA? THINK ABOUT
> > IT.....!!
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! 
> Search.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping>
>
> 
>



-- 
regards,
Vithur

A.R.RAHMAN -  MY BREATH & LIFE FORCE

Reply via email to