Ajith, i completely agree with you. I think ARR's songs are 
challneges to any mediocre or an OK singer. The best example may be 
the music talent shows. I watched almost all the episodes of Sa Re 
Ga Ma Pa that aired last year and saw every singer fail miserably on 
ARR's tracks. They performed well on the same songs later when they 
were trained properly.

In Bengali, we often discuss one thing that some poet write for mass 
people and some write for other poets only. ARR is a music director 
whose music is truly and completely understood by another 
knowlegable person only (by stating this I am not inflating myself 
because I think I love his music and have to go ways to understand 
it perfectly). He gives 'food' of that standard which common man 
cannot digest, but yes they can definitely savour it. 

Have anybody travelled by train in North India belt? There are a 
number of beggers on this trek who sing amazingly. Their range and 
skill of singing is unbelievable. Everytime on my trip to home, i 
ask them to sit and sing in my compartment. All the songs they sing 
are either by Nadeem Shravan or Anu Malik. I know they are also very 
good composers but their music is like water - can be digested by 
any and everybody but leaves no mark later. 

Durba




--- In [email protected], "Pradeepan" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, this certainly is an interesting topic.
> 
> first abt the difficulty of Singing ARR Tunes:
> In a way it may be true. But Ajit, were you referring to the Tune
> itself being complicated or the Lyrics ?
> as far as Lyrics are concerned, Great Lyrics with good phonetics 
can
> only give 10% to the song at best. MUSIC will always be the #1 
Factor.
> that is one reason why Language is also not a barrier for Good 
Music.
> Regarding the tune itself being complicated, I dont know - maybe 
true.
> Ai Hairathe song maybe complicated in terms of Tune - but still the
> Mind can keep playing them over n over. So whether I am singing it
> aloud while walking/bathing doesnt really matter :)
> 
> About Visuals:
> I agree that great visuals can enhance a song's popularity. But I 
want
> to tell again that MUSIC will remain the #1 factor for a song. 
Even if
> Prabhu Deva hadnt danced for Muqqabla song , what do you think wud
> have happened ? I have no doubt that it would have been a massive 
hit.
> Of course the exceptions wud be songs that were watched just for 
the
> Visuals.
> 
> Of all the ARTS, MUSIC will always be #1.
> It is greater than the movie itself.
> It is greater than the Lyrics itself.
> Plus as Shwetha says, the best way to enjoy music is to close the
> eyes, and absorb the Music into the mind.
> 
> God Bless ARR.
> Bye.
> 
> --- In [email protected], Shwetha Signs <shwethasigns@>
> wrote:
> >
> > To Dear Ajit_ji Mundra-Ji :-)
> >    
> >   Sorry to kid u. I thought of addrsng u with twice ji's as one 
for
> targeting video two days back & now audio is fired to mean what i 
say
> here now. What happnd ? Mind breaking ! ...... 
> >    
> >   First u targeted the directors to mention.... you want to see
> mr.ARR work only with bollywood directors especially mr.gowariker 
for
> others are not visualising his songs properly. Now its audio turn, 
TO
> TARGET MR. RAHMAN HIMSELF. If you subtract your arguments.., the
> resultant will be M/s.Nadeem Shravan & other such simple music 
making
> bollywood MDs must work with bollywood directors. Good going. As 
per
> your argument already mr.ARR is not composing all of bollywood 
movies
> as there r other BW-MDs doing their bit. Then why worry. Only few
> BW-Dirs pick mr.ARR. 
> >    
> >   Added to that If that is your & such fans' wish then Fans in 
other
> regions ll be happier ever than now to enjoy ARR's works in more
> regional films than this too much expecting fans of bollywood for 
they
> could be not be satisfied by any means. Sorry to ask something in
> general to all such dissatisfied fans, whether are they correct in
> all, 100% ? If you analyse like this you cannot enjoy any outcome 
of
> present entertainment. Its better to realize & enjoy the works as 
it
> is... presented. Otherwise you will not find satisfaction forever.
> Take life as it comes. No fuss needed. 
> >    
> >   I like to refer what gr8 visuals we see in Water movie songs, a
> serious theme. It is ordinary. But songs are extraordinary. We do 
not
> need visuals at all, when we able to appreciate any kind of good
> music. Even in garments & designing, MISMATCH is also a fashion 
than
> usual matching. So if visuals do not match just forget & enjoy 
music.
> For that it is not fair to pin-point certain things directly or
> indirectly. Or intentions ?
> >    
> >   To me & my friends, when it is music, we wont switch on video
> songs for... that will distract from enjoying music completely. 
And if
> we wish to see video, wont try to match the audio and just enjoy 
the
> visuals. Visuals in songs are not depicting reality. Just an
> exaggeration, imagination & even absurd to say be it any movie, if 
you
> analyse deep in your way to say people do not dance daily or do not
> sing nearly 5 mts. while shopping or while doing any action for 
that
> sake be it a simple song.
> >    
> >   Kindly consider my post in right spirit. Rgds 
> >    
> >    
> >   
> > 
> > Ajit <ajit_mundra@> wrote:
> >    
> >           For now, I'm speaking about his Hindi output. When I
> listen to songs
> > like Ay Hairathe, Tere Bina, Lukka Chuppi, Tu Bin Bataye, Yeh 
Rishta,
> > Yeh Jo Desh, Saawariya, Pal Pal Bhari, Desh Ki Mitti, Naina 
Neer, Piya
> > Ho, etc. etc. etc., there is no doubt in my mind that no other 
musical
> > director in recent times has created as powerful and moving 
melodies
> > as our Boss. Nevermind the arrangements, rhythm, sound, for 
which our
> > Boss is already king and known for it. There is an evergreen 
stamp to
> > many of his recent melodies. However, I don't hear the media or 
the
> > general public raving about his sense of melody too often. And I
> > think it's ignorant to say that Rahman should be known for his
> > technical skills rather than his tune skills. Without a doubt, 
the
> > man is a master tunesmith. I just don't see how people don't 
realize
> > that when listening to the examples above.
> > 
> > One reason why his melodies may not be as appreciated as they 
should
> > is based on a comment that my parents made recently after 
listening to
> > some of Rahman's songs. They like Rahman a lot and know how 
brilliant
> > he is, etc. However, they keep mentioning how the songs of today 
in
> > general compared to the evergreen years lack powerful yet simple
> > melodies and moving lyrics. When I point to Rahman's songs, they
> > agree that his songs are melodious, but the THEY ARE HARD TO 
SING. 
> > For them, that is the sticking point, that Rahman's songs are 
often
> > too difficult to sing (unless one is a trained and talented 
singer)
> > and one cannot hum them as easily. Seems like an overly 
simplistic
> > point, but perhaps to the commaon man, it's true. While Rahman's
> > songs are beautiful, full of melody, the melodic contours are 
often
> > full of twists and turns and tinged with a classical bent, 
making them
> > difficult for the average person to just listen with ease and to 
hum
> > along. I think this makes a difference with popularity. Many of
> > Rahman's most commercially successful numbers were ones that 
were not
> > only catchy, but easy to hum along and sing with. 
> > 
> > Maybe this is the reason why Nadeem Shravan were called "the 
melody
> > kings" (don't make me laugh too hard). Although their melodies 
were
> > often stale and cheesy, their songs were easy to sing along with,
> > light and easy music for the common man to digest. Not that 
Rahman
> > has to ever stoop as low as NS, but perhaps there is a point 
here. 
> > One of the reasons why the song "Tere Bina" is so popular is 
perhaps
> > that along with being beautiful and brilliant, the melody itself 
is
> > fairly simple enough to understand and remember easily, esp. the 
dham
> > dhara dham part. Same goes for Ru Ba Ru from RDB.
> > 
> > Anyway, agree or disagree, I think this will be interesting to 
discuss. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >          
> > 
> >  
> > ---------------------------------
> > 8:00? 8:25? 8:40?  Find a flick in no time
> >  with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
> >
>


Reply via email to