utter failure..i disagree.. its runnin in packed houses here..
i jus watched it yest..:)
N only one complaint which i heard was 'songs not bein placed
properly'..other than that AL lOVED the FILM..
N these opiniions r from my friends who r not arr or mani fans..
they LOVED it.. !!
N BGM was jus awesome..'jaage hain'..whole day i was haunted by this
tune..!!
--- In [email protected], $*$ PaVaN $*$ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Mr.Riyaz Ahamed,
>
> I agree to all your points below,if you could tell me one album
in the indian film industry that you enjoyed more...Pls...share your
amazing music knowledge with us.Since you didnt like any rahman
albums after alaipayuthey or boys...after that period do let us know
which other albums you enjoyed..
>
>
>
>
>
> riyaz ahamed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i'm not telling about Guru, its period film ok. what about other
films only few films are ok like sillunuorukaadhal, rahman should
stop using raw tabla sound & old hindi songs style really
irritating, even in modern film his sounds are like 1980's track
(ex.GODFATHER). after alaypayuthae no films are upto his standard
excluding boys. i'm not Anti-ARR, what i'm telling here is he should
stop using old sounds. he should try different sounds & technology
according to todays trend not a decades b4 style . even in modern
sounds it was not clear while harris music was so clear, why rahman
cant use that technology. The technology was not owned Harris he is
not a inventor.i 'm great fan of Rahman from Roja, as a fan i need
to mention his errors. if u people are true fan u need to bring this
to Mr.A.R.Rahman unless u people are not a true fan
>
> ramana chandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> oh come on arr fans are not supposed to be like this
watever he is done for guru he is done it in a classy way and u jus
cant expect lose control songss for guru u see it has to be how it
should be not like how u expect............ reply
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: riyaz ahamed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 6:45:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [arr] Guru - Fails Miserably ( utter failure)
>
> i agree with u rafeeq, he should come out from 1980's sytle
music
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] com wrote: hii every body
> itwas nice to hear that there are all type of fans for ARR and
MR.
> members in this groep has the ample rights to oppose or support
admire or critisise
> ARRs work. Its not a healthy argument that those who critisise
ARR an Mani Ratnam should go out of the group.
> Guru is an average movie to put it in simple.
> theres nothing to say it was awsome or fantastic. the music
including BGM was not to the expectation. not even comparable with
dilse or KM. or even yuva.
> Our boss need a change . Like shanker to introduse harris , Mani
sir also to make some changes.
> Anwer, 36 china town etc did well in the industry with music for
their CDs hav a good sales in market. ARRs music is not nowadays
impressing the average listeners other than our group.
> am I right,,if wrong so sorry
>
> plsssss reply
>
>
> Tamil Pakkam <tamilpakkam@ gmail.com> wrote:
> What are u guys talking about waste of $15 and
time........ ........Please dont make evryone in the group
angry ..........so tell me which was better movie that was released
recently that is comparable to Guru........ ......
>
> On 1/16/07, Kalimuthu V <kalimuthu.v@ lgsoftindia. com>
wrote: I also agree with you in 1, 3 (Esp. Lahari
song), 6, 7,8,9.
>
> Music could have been much better. Nothing impressive in BGM!
>
> ARR is, perhaps, tired of giving best for Mani but not getting
any appreciation for his efforts. Most of his work in KM (Tremendous
songs), Uyire (Excellent songs & BGM) went unnoticed.
>
> As Mani mentioned in his recent Tamil interview, he should give
it a try with his friend IR for his next movie.
> It might give a break for Mani as well as ARR.
>
> From: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] com] On Behalf Of s_sundarr_2000
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 5:02 PM
> To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com
> Subject: [arr] Guru - Fails Miserably
>
>
>
> hi,
>
> this is my personal opinion abt guru. I watched it last sunday
paying
> (wasting) 15$.
>
> I did not like the movie @ all. The things i hated in the movie
are:
>
> 1.unnecessary episode of vidya balan/maddy, am sure mani wanted a
> movie to run for 2.45 hrs, with the original script it was only
for 2
> hrs, then he thougth to include this.
> 2. aish is not convincing in her role, look so thin and acting is
jaded.
> 3. songs r unnecessary and placed badly in the movies. mayya (2
stanza
> was cut r probably pushed to background) is not necessary,
immediately
> followd by barso re (again 2nd stanza pushed to background - except
> for few lines). ay hairathe does come in bits and pieces, tera
bina is
> not fully picturised and fails to create a impact on screen as it
was
> on trailers and audio's. yammo yammo was okey and baazi laga -
highly
> unnecessary.
> 4. rajiv menons work was alrite and nothing that gr8.
> 5. rahman's bgm was okey, he used a lot of songs pieces in the bgm
as
> they were not used by mani properly.
> 6. so many scenes in rain, barso re, whenver abhishek addresses his
> staff, prathap pothan episode. why does mani waste so much water
when
> there is so much scarcity in chennai. the point is rain is not
reqd.
> agreed in 1st song of mouna ragam but why repetedly here?
> 7. moves @ a liesurely pace and doesn't pick up anytime
> 8. abhishek does all his acts and justifies in 4.5 min saying .5
min
> is profit, naah it did not work. where did gandhi come in? who
asked
> abt his past to the panel that 2 shirts/15000 rupees stuff? they
were
> asking reasons and justifications for his act?
> 9.where did mithun disappear in the end?
>
> only gud thing was abhishek acting. rahman's songs fails to create
an
> impact on screen, it was very gud in audio and i was jumping.!
>
> better luck next time mani ! probably lajjo is more in terms of
period
> again who knows?
>
> waste of time and money!
>
>
>
>
>
> ############ ######### ######### ######### ######### #########
THIS EMAIL MESSAGE IS FOR THE SOLE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
AND MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. ANY
UNAUTHORIZED REVIEW, USE, DISCLOSURE OR DISTRIBUTION IS
PROHIBITED.BEFORE OPENING ANY ATTACHMENTS PLEASE CHECK FOR VIRUSES
AND DEFECTS.IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, PLEASE NOTIFY US
IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE.
############ ######### ######### ######### ######### ######### #
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small
Business.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
> Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> The fish are biting.
> Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
> (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
>
