wilfried.mei...@gmail.com wrote: > I can confirm that with lowering the memory frequency the H5 now is absolutely > stable. Things that failed before, like pkg_check, installing texlive or > compiling the kernel and userland now finish reliably without errors on my > Nanopi Neo2.
Don't forget to add the opp table so you can put the cpus to the max freq: hw.cpuspeed=1344 hw.setperf=100 Has I said, just add some cooling. > I think the cleanest solution would be to file a bug with u-boot > instead of patching the u-boot port in OpenBSD. I did it some months ago. I didn't subscribe to the list so I received a message telling me to wait for the administrator approval. I got tired of checking the list. I didn't want to subscribe to the list because no one shown interest and as I said before I have little time on my hands, this list has a lot of traffic. I will try again this weekend. Colin Tree <colt...@tpg.com.au> wrote: > I have been comparing decompiled dtb files from working linux > (friendlyarm, armbian, dietpi) installs with decompiled openbsd dtb. > home$ dtc -O dts -I dtb -o board.dts board.dtb > checking results against the various datasheets and circuit. There is nothing to check, you can trust me, really. The issue is clear. But if you want to experiment with other dtbs be aware, openbsd is using defines in the code to match phandles in the dtb, so if one is changed, you are screwed. Regards, adr.
