On Friday, May 3, 2019 9:09 PM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 01:38:06 -0700 (MST) > > From: Corsaire01 stranche+open...@free.fr > > Since it cost only a few bucks and I could have same-day delivery I bought a > > Intel 82575EB based card. > > This time it works ! > > here is the output: > > pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 > > em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82575EB" rev 0x01: msi, address > > 00:1b:21:23:08:0b > > em1 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 "Intel 82575EB" rev 0x01: msi, address > > 00:1b:21:23:08:0a > > Right. That suggests that "classic" INTx interrupts don'tr work > correctly (anymore). I'll have a look to see if I can track this > down. > > Was the other em(4) a dual port card as well? Wait, where was the cue that "classic" INTx interrupts don't work on.. ARM64? ARMADA? Was the cue in the quote Jonathan provided about "EXPI9402PT .. 82571GB and msi is disabled on <= 82572 due to an errata" so "Only use MSI on the newer PCIe parts, with the exception" and "of 82571/82572 due to "Byte Enables 2 and 3 Are Not Set" errata"? Joseph
