On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:26:48AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: <s_g...@telus.net>
> > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:11:00 -0800
> > 
> > I thought I would give openbsd arm64 a try and purchased an orangepi pc2.
> > I followed the INSTALL directions and the install of the system went
> > smoothly.
> > I used the lan connection at 1000Mbps to load the system install packages.
> > 
> > Simple things like top and df worked fine.  Then I tried to add a package
> > which resulted in the crash detailed below.
> > Since the kernel on the miniroot seemed to download the installation
> > packages I rebooted to the
> > bsd.sp kernel and tested again with the same results. File systems had to be
> > repaired and it looks like the pkg db was corrupted also.
> > But the crash was very similar.  See bsd.sp below.
> > 
> > Has anyone have any experiences with the orangepi pc2?  The documentation
> > suggests that it is a targeted machine.
> > 
> > I noticed that the boot complains about the dtb when booting from power up:
> > 
> > Scanning mmc 0:1...
> > Found EFI removable media binary efi/boot/bootaa64.efi
> > libfdt fdt_check_header(): FDT_ERR_BADMAGIC
> > Scanning disks on usb...
> > 
> > Is this because there is no longer a dtb on the dos partition after the
> > install recreates the partition?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > bsd.mp crash
> > 
> > oppcsobsd# pkg_add nano
> > quirks-3.83 signed on 2019-01-17T20:44:02Z
> > quirks-3.83: ok
> > nano-3.2:libiconv-1.14p3: ok
> > nano-3.2:gettext-0.19.8.1p3: ok
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > panic: amap_pp_adjref: negative reference count
> > Stopped at      panic+0x148:        TID    PID    UID     PRFLAGS     PFLAGS
> > C
> > PU  COMMAND
> > *447051  73332      0      0x1015          0    2K perl
> > db_enter() at panic+0x144
> > panic() at uvm_unmap_detach+0x7c
> > uvm_unmap_detach() at uvmspace_exec+0x1d0
> > uvmspace_exec() at sys_execve+0x5a8
> > sys_execve() at svc_handler+0x264
> > svc_handler() at do_el0_sync+0x1b0
> > do_el0_sync() at handle_el0_sync+0x74
> > https://www.openbsd.org/ddb.html describes the minimum info required in bug
> > reports.  Insufficient info makes it difficult to find and fix bugs.
> > ddb{2}>
> > ddb{2}>
> > ddb{2}>
> > ddb{2}> trace
> > db_enter() at panic+0x144
> > panic() at uvm_unmap_detach+0x7c
> > uvm_unmap_detach() at uvmspace_exec+0x1d0
> > uvmspace_exec() at sys_execve+0x5a8
> > sys_execve() at svc_handler+0x264
> > svc_handler() at do_el0_sync+0x1b0
> > do_el0_sync() at handle_el0_sync+0x74
> > handle_el0_sync() at 0x1859d328e0
> > address 0x7ffffdd418 is invalid
> > --- trap ---
> 
> I see the exact same error on my Orange Pi PC2.  It is still unclear
> to me if this issue is specific to that board or a generic issue with
> the Allwinner H5 SoC.  I've never seen the error on the Allwinner A64
> though.
> 

My NanoPi Neo2, which is H5 based as well, is also rather unstable.

Reply via email to