> On May 22, 2015, at 8:50 AM, Henrik Lund Kramshøj <h...@kramse.org> wrote: > > >> On 22 May 2015, at 16:40, Philip Cheney <phi...@packwidth.net> wrote: >> >> ... >> I've been building packages as I need them on a Beaglebone Black and I can >> go ahead and start a bulk build. >> >> While it's building, I'll pick up something a little more suitable for the >> task, too. It looks like the Wandboard is fairly well supported and the Quad >> model has a bit more punch for the cost. Does anyone know of any caveats to >> using that system? >> > > I am a happy BBB user and will be happy add some EUR/$ for donation to > someone willing to build packages. > > I will prefer to have something permanent setup, but if we start out getting > some hardware and estimating the "cost" time, hardware etc. for doing this it > would be great.
FreeBSD has had good luck with using userland qemu emulation to build packages. More stable than random hardware that was never intended to have such a load on it, and quite a bit faster than these little boards. Warner
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
