> On Oct 7, 2014, at 22:54, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:04:05PM -0500, jordon wrote: >> >> On Oct 7, 2014, at 21:56, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:50:34PM -0500, jordon wrote: >>>> SoâÂÅ did I miss a memo or have a severe brain fart or is the etc.tgz >>>> file missing in the current snapshot for armv7? >>> >>> The etc set has moved into base in -current snapshots so the infrastructure >>> to mirror snapshots has changed to not copy out the etc set. >>> >>> The problem is the armv7 snapshot is so old it was still built with an >>> external etc set. >>> >>> So yes, the etc set is missing. This is unlikely to change until another >>> snapshot is built. The current snapshot also lacks the fix to make >>> the eMMC on the rev C BeagleBone Black work. >> >> Ahh. Thanks. That makes sense. The installer kept failing, though this >> time I told it to continue anyway. Weâll see if it works⊠>> >> So going forward, where is this kind of info available? I searched the >> openbsd-arm mail list for etc.tgz but found nothing (though if >> this is a system wide change, it probably wouldnât be in arm). Looking at >> http://www.openbsd.org/plus.html, i now see several references >> to etc and moving stuff to base, but no explicit âetc set is goneâ. Do >> I just have to pay more attention to the mail list? >> > > Changes to -current that may need some manual steps should be > documented on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html > > There does not seem to be a note about the etc set, if the snapshot > were up to date it would be transparent as the installer extracts > it from the base set. >
Installer expects etc.tgz and there isn’t one. I tell it to continue but it just tries again.
