Hello Patrick
Thanks for you quick reply.
The Nitrogen6x looks like a more serious design, not hobbyist
like the other systems.
I think I'll go ahead and order a couple Pandaboard ES. In
the future if Nitrogen6x support is added I might consider them
again.
I know from past experience it is better to use a system that
is more widely used by the OpenBSD community. I have several
landisk and armish devices gathering dust.
Thank you for your efforts,
diana
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Patrick Wildt wrote:
Hello Diana,
I didn't get much resonance for that board, so I didn't pursue
getting that arch into the tree. First, I'd like to have a generic
ARM arch, so that you don't have to have an arch for every
SoC out there.
Nevertheless, my i.MX6 / Sabre Lite runs fine.
\Patrick
Am 16.08.2013 um 21:20 schrieb Diana Eichert <deich...@wrench.com>:
Hello
On 3/25/2013 Patrick wrote in a post on misc@ that he
had OpenBSD running on the Boundart Nitrogen6x.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=136423091817923&w=2
However in the recent additions to the Beagle platform
the Boundary board is not mentioned. I was about to
purchase some Pandaboard ES boards, but thought I should
ask about the status of the Nitrogen6x before I place
the order.
thanks
diana
