Before I forget I was meant to comment about this topic a while ago. I
have to agree with below commends about how weird AC works.
For some that are used to be members, have been used with this structure
and have the control to micro-manage things it may sound fine things the
way they are, but I also find weird the way AC was structured in the
past to have such tight control of these details and I felt the same
comment below on one previous proposals.
The center of any proposal should always be on the author(s) and
shepherds should only facilitate discussion both within the AC and with
the community, but have very little input into modifying the text. Above
all what should always prevail is the author's idea. If his/her idea is
too much out of what the community understands or believe is good and
the author is not willing to make any adjustments than it shall not
reach consensus and life follows normally.
I also have a feeling that sometimes AC members personal view end up
overcoming the author's original idea (maybe not intentionally I reckon)
which should never happen and there should be a high level of attention
from each one to try to eliminate anything related to their personal
view when dealing with advancing that proposal or not. In short, AC
should not ever act as a mini parliament to analyze merit of any
proposals, but merely evaluate if there has been consensus from
community about a proposal and of course if it matches whatever minimum
necessary for a proposal to go through the whole policy development process.
For that reason I also don't see ARIN PDP as a proper PDP compared to
all others and suggest all involved parties to think of modifications of
the current structure to make it more centered on both author proposal
idea and community as sovereign, of course along with ARIN Board to
ratify proposals that may not bring any legal damage to the
organization. Maybe there was a reason to have such a tight and
concentrated power in the past when it was created, but now a days it
doesn't seem the best in terms of balance between community and members
interest.
Best regards
Fernando
On 26/10/2023 15:11, jordi.palet--- via ARIN-PPML wrote:
This hast not been my experience.
In several of my proposals to the ARIN PDP, I was tied to follow the shepherds
inputs, and I’m convinced that those proposals failed because that.
And I recall one specific case, that the AC edits resulted in a major problem,
requiring a new policy proposal to amend it back.
That’s why I don’t really see the ARIN PDP as a “real” PDP compared to the
other regions.
In my experience, the AC works very hard to remain true to the author’s
original intent and involve author(s) in the editorial process of a policy.
The AC is also extremely receptive to whatever community input is
available on a policy in most cases.
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
