No, but that probably should have been included in the “RESULT” of the original message.
Owen > On Aug 1, 2023, at 12:15, Leif Sawyer <lsaw...@gci.com> wrote: > > o...@delong.com <mailto:o...@delong.com> writes: > > i...@arin.net <mailto:i...@arin.net> writes: > >> > >> Policy Statement: > >> Section 3.6.3: > >> > >> Change paragraph 1 text > >> > >> FROM: “This policy applies to every Organization that has a direct > >> assignment, direct allocation, or AS number from ARIN” > >> > >> TO: “This policy applies to every Organization that has Internet number > >> resources registered with ARIN" > >> > >> RESULT: “This policy applies to every Organization that has Internet > >> number resources registered with ARIN (or one of its predecessor > >> registries) or a reallocation from an upstream ISP.” > > > > > > I believe as worded, this has the unintended consequence of adding effect > > to registered reassignments. > > > > If that is the intent (significant change of actual policy) vs. adopting > > existing policy language to match existing behavior in new circumstances > > (as stated in the problem statement), then that’s fine, but it should be > > clearly stated as the intent. > > > > If that is not the intent (and I suspect it is not), some wordsmithing is > > in order. > > Owen, > > The complete text for 3.6.3 currently reads: > "This policy applies to every Organization that has a direct assignment, > direct allocation, or AS number from ARIN (or one of its predecessor > registries) or a reallocation from an upstream ISP. This includes but is not > limited to upstream ISPs and their downstream ISP customers (as defined by > NRPM 2.5 and 2.6), but not reassignments made to their downstream end user > customers." > > The effect of the proposed policy change would then render out the text as: > “This policy applies to every Organization that has Internet number resources > registered with ARIN (or one of its predecessor registries) or a reallocation > from an upstream ISP. This includes but is not limited to upstream ISPs and > their downstream ISP customers (as defined by NRPM 2.5 and 2.6), but not > reassignments made to their downstream end user customers." > > Given the exclusion of reassignments at the end of the policy paragraph > remains intact, do you still see any unintended consequences? > > Leif
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
