I think some resource holders have avoided even signing the LRSA because
doing so gives them something "Free", and who does not like "Free".
I often wonder if those who do this are also the leaders in the avoid IPv6
movement, since IPv6 major adoption ends their free lunch.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, Noah wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, 08:18 Jo Rhett, <[email protected]> wrote:
On Apr 8, 2022, at 11:40 PM, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML
<[email protected]> wrote:
the contractual language in the LRSA referred to a maximum increase
in the amount paid under the LRSA of $25/year. Admittedly, this language
was removed from later versions of the LRSA and
Owen, I like you. I know you are smart and kind and ... but seriously? 25 years
later, lets argue once again that the legacy resource holders with their special
contracts just aren't special enough? Pardon me while I slam my head into the
desk repeatedly, wondering why this pain remains two and half decades later.
Sign the damn RSA please and stop this crap. Those of us with real morals
signed the RSA back when it first started, and didn't wait around and argue
nonsense
about privilege for years until ARIN was forced to make a contract to make us
feel special.
This is a reasonable advice.
You got 25 years of special rights, is that not enough?
You got that right :-)
Sign the RSA. The same RSA anyone else signs.
Yap....
Cheers
Noah
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
