[email protected] wrote:
The MAJOR problem with the use of 240/4 is the hard coding of these
addresses in Router and Workstation operating systems. This is NOT an
ARIN problem.
I understand it is just a flag and a recompile in Linux, but trying to
get Cisco and Microsoft to go along with this idea is going to take a
bit more effort than complaining about it on this list.
I see no reason to do that, as I have more IPv6 addresses than I can
dream of.
I have been running my home network off of ONE ipv4 address, as well
as two /48s of IPv6. I do not understand why IPv6 is so hated. I
also understand that Win10/11 does not like it all if you turn off the
V6 stack and throws random errors.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
No problem. That will either happen or not, users will either benefit or
not. However that is not a valid reason to preclude it from even being
attempted.
IPv6 may be a very nice protocol. However that does not change the fact
that it has failed to cure the internet thus far.
Joe
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
