> On Sep 12, 2021, at 14:44 , Joe Maimon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Owen DeLong wrote: >> The refusal to deploy 240/4 are mostly on the basis that it would take just >> as much code effort to do that as it would to put v6 on a box, with the >> exception that most boxes already have a v6 stack, so actually more effort, >> yet yielding substantially less gain. > Turns out that was wrong for the last 20 years. Time to shut that one down. > It was a stupid self fulfilling mantra from the getgo. As if it is the place > of the IETF to determine how engineers ought to spend their efforts. Their > role is to enable. Not throw up roadblocks. Same here. > > Also, your wording is misleading. > > More correctly, "the refusal to step out of the way of deployment of 240/4 > (by those who may have wished to do so)” >
I don’t think the IETF can stop you if you want to deploy 240/4 on your own network. Go for it. Owen _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
