Actually, Roku is one of the parties that would face a potential forcing function if Comcast and/or some others of similar size in the Eyeball market announced a date when they would start surcharging IPv4.
Owen > On Sep 11, 2021, at 20:20 , Paul E McNary <[email protected]> wrote: > > I must somewhat agree. Our fiber provide to our ISP just recently rolled out > ipv6 but not dual stack. > We have a great deal of problems routing to ipv6 hosts from our customers > ipv6 ip addresses. > We have trouble with our Verizon phones on ipv6 getting to our routers. > People out in the country putting in video surveillance systems that the will > only use a static ipv4 IP. > We are out of ipv4 IP's. > So at this point it costs us customers and increased service calls when ROKU > says the ISP (Us) is at fault. > They expect us to cover the min. $100 service call fee on a $50 plan > Tell me how can that work. > > I have been quiet on this list for 2 or 3 years. This entire message chain > makes no good solution. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joe Maimon" <[email protected]> > To: "Owen DeLong" <[email protected]>, "William Herrin" <[email protected]> > Cc: "arin-ppml" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2021 9:59:35 PM > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Change of Use and ARIN (was: Re: AFRINIC And The > Stability Of The Internet Number Registry System) > > Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML wrote: >> >>> On Sep 10, 2021, at 19:29 , William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:42 PM Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> May I ask if you're thinking changes with the understand that all of the >>>> addresses being considered are going to be purchased. >>> Hi Mike, >>> >>> I suppose my real worry is that the address sale market dries up >>> because it's more lucrative to lease them. With leasing agents running >>> around helping address holders monetize their IP addresses through >>> leasing in order to take a cut. That would be a travesty. >> Would it? The easiest way to eliminate leasing providers outright is to >> migrate to v6. >> >> The industry seems to prefer leasing providers over v6, so meh. Are all the >> market >> proponents going to claim the invisible hand is wrong now? >> >> Owen >> >> > The invisible hand has its middle finger extended, telling you and those > like you what many have been saying for years unto deaf ears. IPv6 and > its migration have been and continue to be an utter disaster, created > purely out of ivory tower hubris that designed it to be an incompatible > dual stack dual cost useless investment for most of the actual users of > the network. > > And it was easily predictable. > > Joe > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
