I am also against this proposal.

If we allow holders of larger blocks back onto the list, we take away blocks that should go to smaller holders.

The waiting list is NOT a lottery to be "won", and I think the policy should not change.

Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.


On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Andrew Dul wrote:


I do not support the reintroduction of organizations onto the wait-list who 
were removed due to having existing address holdings larger than a /20.  Being
on the wait-list was never a guarantee that you would receive space.  The AC 
had to balance the various elements of block size and organizations who would
be eligible to receive space under the updated policy and we were aware that 
the rules as implemented would prevent some organizations on the wait-list from
receiving blocks going forward. 

Speaking only for myself, not the AC

Andrew

On 6/19/2020 11:25 AM, Alyssa Moore wrote:
      Hi folks, 

      There was some great discussion of this policy proposal at ARIN45. We 
hear a wide range of views including:
       1. Don't grandfather organizations. The new waitlist policy is sound. 
       2. Organizations that were on the waitlist before 2019-16 should be 
eligible for their original request size (even if it exceeds the new limit
          of a /22). 
       3. Organizations that were on the waitlist before 2019-16 should remain 
eligible if their holdings exceed a /20 OR a /18. The draft policy
          under discussion specifies a /18 total holdings for grandfathered 
orgs, while the current waitlist policy (2019-16) specifies a /20.
       4. Organizations that were on the waitlist before 2019-16 should be 
eligible regardless of their total holdings because that was not a
          restriction of the policy under which they originally qualified for 
the waitlist. 
       There was general support to continue finessing this draft. If you have 
views on the above noted parameters, please make them known here.

For reference: 

Old waitlist policy
 1. Requester specifies smallest block they'd be willing to accept, equal to or 
larger than the applicable minimum size specified elsewhere in ARIN
    policy.
 2. Did not place a limit on the total existing IP address holdings of a party 
eligible for the waitlist.
 3. Made resources issued from the waitlist ineligible for transfer until after 
a period of 12 months. 
New Waitlist Policy
 1. Limits the size of block ARIN can issue on the waitlist to a /22.
 2. Places a limit on the total existing IP address holdings of a party 
eligible for the waitlist at a /20 or less.
 3. Makes resources issued from the waitlist ineligible for transfer until 
after a period of 60 months.  

Best, 
Alyssa

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:35 PM David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote:
      I support this policy and believe the policy development process is the 
proper place to handle this issue. However, this policy seems to
      be implementable as a one-time policy directive to ARIN Staff. Once 
implemented, by putting the effected organizations back on the waiting
      list, it seems unnecessary to memorialized the text in the NRPM, it would 
immediately become extraneous and potentially confusing to
      future readers of the NRPM.
Therefore, I would like to recommend the Policy Statement not be added to the 
NRPM upon its implementation. I believe this to be consistent with
the intent of the policy.  Otherwise, does ARIN Staff have procedural advice on 
how best to handle what seems like a one-time directive?

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:21 PM ARIN <[email protected]> wrote:

      Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2: Grandfathering of Organizations Removed from
      Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16

      Problem Statement:

      The implementation of the ARIN-2019-16 Advisory Council Recommendation
      Regarding NRPM 4.1.8: Unmet Requests caused some organizations to be
      removed from the waiting list that were approved under the old policy’s
      eligibility criteria. These organizations should have been grandfathered
      when the waitlist was reopened to allow them to receive an allocation of
      IPv4 up to the new policy’s maximum size constraint of a /22.

      Policy Statement: Update NRPM Section 4.1.8 as follows:

      Add section 4.1.8.3 (temporary language in the NRPM to remain until the
      policy objective is achieved)

      Restoring organizations to the waitlist

      ARIN will restore organizations that were removed from the waitlist at
      the adoption of ARIN-2019-16 to their previous position if their total
      holdings of IPv4 address space amounts to a /18 or less. The maximum
      size aggregate that a reinstated organization may qualify for is a /22.

      All restored organizations extend their 2 year approval by [number of
      months between July 2019 and implementation of new policy]. Any requests
      met through a transfer will be considered fulfilled and removed from the
      waiting list.

      Comments:

      Timetable for implementation: Immediate

      Anything Else: While attending ARIN 44 and discussing this with other
      community members the vast majority indicated that they agreed that some
      organizations were treated unfairly. This proposal is a remedy.
      _______________________________________________
      ARIN-PPML
      You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
      the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
      Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
      https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
      Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.



--
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:[email protected]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.


_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.


_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to