Hi Tom - responses inline. One additional point - the current policy places a limit on how often an organization can receive resources from the waiting list. This draft changes the hold-down timer so that it now applies to *applications* for new allocations under the waiting list policy, not the receipt of resources from it.
> On Mar 3, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Tom Fantacone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Chris, > > The "clarification" part of your proposal seems to be a no brainer (the > waiting period is meant to apply to allocations only under section 4). I > assume ARIN staff is already interpreting it this way since that was the > intent of the section. So I wouldn't sever it unless the full policy doesn't > gain support in which case we could revisit just inserting the clarification > part. > That assumption is my understanding as well. > Regarding this: > "- Disallows organizations that have transferred space to other parties > within the past 12 months from applying for additional IPv4 space under NRPM > Section 4. " > > I want to make sure I understand it correctly. If you transfer out space via > 8.2/8.3/8.4, does this restriction mean you just can't receive space via the > waiting list for 12 months, or via any mechanism (waiting list/transfer) for > 12 months? I think it means from the waiting list only, but want to be sure. > That is correct - note the phrase “...under this section...” in the proposal text. Thanks, -Chris > Tom > > > > ---- On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:48:01 -0500 Chris Woodfield <[email protected]> > wrote ---- > > Speaking as the policy author, I’ll make two points: > > 1. I’m aware that given the other discussions around waiting list policy that > are ongoing, this proposal may well be rendered moot by future policy > changes. I still believe that this is worth pursuing as there’s a current > need for clarification and increased disincentives for bad behavior today. > 2. I’m deliberately killing two not-terribly-related birds with one stone > with this proposal, based on the fact that the two issues noted from the PER > can be addressed by adding language to the same NRPM text. Happy to consider > severing them if the community prefers. > > Thanks, > > -Chris > > > On Mar 2, 2019, at 9:33 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > I think it is time to start the ball on the other policies. > > > > +1 on this. It seems focused on those gathering resources to resell. > > > > Albert Erdmann > > Network Administrator > > Paradise On Line Inc. > t [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
