I should have waited a few extra minutes before replying ...


I'm ok with this new text wording.



Thanks!





Regards,

Jordi

 

 



-----Mensaje original-----

De: ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> en nombre de ARIN <[email protected]>

Fecha: lunes, 13 de agosto de 2018, 12:39

Para: <[email protected]>

Asunto: [arin-ppml] Revised/Retitled - Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification 
on Temporary Sub-Assignments



    

    The following has been revised and retitled:

    

    * Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification on Temporary Sub-Assignments

    

    Formerly:

    

    * Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

    

    Revised text is below and can be found at:

    https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2018_4.html

    

    You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will 

    evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft 

    policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as 

    stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these 

    principles are:

    

    * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration

    * Technically Sound

    * Supported by the Community

    

    The PDP can be found at:

    https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

    

    Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:

    https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html

    

    Regards,

    

    Sean Hopkins

    Policy Analyst

    American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)

    

    

    

    Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification on Temporary Sub-Assignments

    

    Problem Statement:

    

    When the policy was drafted, the concept of assignments/sub-assignments 

    did not consider the use of IP addresses in hotspots, or the use of IP 

    addresses by guests or employees in Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and 

    many other similar cases.

    

    Additionally, the IETF has recently approved the use of a unique IPv6 

    /64 prefix per interface/host (RFC8273) instead of a unique address. 

    This, for example, allows users to connect to a hotspot, receive a /64 

    such that they are "isolated" from other users (for reasons of security, 

    regulatory requirements, etc.) and they can also use multiple virtual 

    machines on their devices with a unique address for each one (within the 

    same /64).

    

    Section 2.5 (Definitions/Allocate and Assign), explicitly prohibits such 

    assignments, stating that "Assignments... are not to be sub-assigned to 

    other parties".

    

    This proposal clarifies this situation in this regard and better define 

    the concept, particularly considering new uses of IPv6 (RFC8273), by 

    means of additional language added to the definition of an Assignment.

    

    Note that the proposal text also incorporates changes made under an 

    Editorial Change currently awaiting Board of Trustees review, available 

    here: https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_11.html

    

    Policy Statement:

    

    Actual Text, Section 2.5:

    

    • Assign - To assign means to delegate address space to an ISP or 

    end-user, for specific use within the Internet infrastructure they 

    operate. Assignments must only be made for specific purposes documented 

    by specific organizations and are not to be sub-assigned to other parties.

    

    New Text:

    

    • Assignment - Address space delegated to an organization directly by 

    ARIN for the exclusive use of the recipient organization. A temporary 

    assignment of address space provided to third parties shall not be 

    considered an assignment or a violation of the exclusive use criterion.

    

    Comments

    

    Timetable for implementation:

    

    Immediate

    

    Anything else:

    

    Situation in other regions:

    

    This situation, has already been corrected in RIPE, and the policy was 

    updated in a similar way, even if right now there is a small discrepancy 

    between the policy text that reached consensus and the RIPE NCC Impact 

    Analysis. A new policy proposal has been submitted to amend that, and 

    the text is the same as presented by this proposal at ARIN. Same text 

    has also been submitted to AfriNIC, LACNIC and APNIC.

    _______________________________________________

    ARIN-PPML

    You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to

    the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).

    Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:

    https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml

    Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

    




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to