As previously stated, IMHO, we should revise 8.5.4 to be consistent with 4.2.2.
Owen > On Jan 31, 2018, at 13:18 , David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > There seems to be a bit of controversy on the direction to take this policy. > Therefore as the shepherd, it would be helpful to hear from additional > community members regarding this policy. > > Do you support or oppose the policy as written? > > Do you think the inconsistency described in the Problem Statement should be > corrected? > > If yes, should it be corrected by revising by section 8.5.4 to be consistent > with section 4.2.2, as proposed by the current text? > > Or, as an alternative by revising section 4.2.2 to be consistent with section > 8.5.4? > > Are there other alternatives to correct the inconsistency to be considered? > > Other suggestions or comments? > > Your additional feedback and participation are appreciated, thank you. > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 7:42 AM, ARIN <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > The following has been revised: > > * Draft Policy ARIN-2017-9: Clarification of Initial Block Size for IPv4 ISP > Transfers > > Revised text is below and can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_9.html > <https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_9.html> > > You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will > evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft > policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in > the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are: > > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration > * Technically Sound > * Supported by the Community > > The PDP can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html <https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html> > > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html > <https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html> > > Regards, > > Sean Hopkins > Policy Analyst > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2017-9: Clarification of Initial Block Size for IPv4 ISP > Transfers > > Problem Statement: > > It was noted in the ARIN 40 Policy Experience Report, that there is an > inconsistency in the initial block size for ISPs. Section 4.2.2 notes that > the initial ISP block size should be /21 whereas the initial block size in > 8.5.4 is noted as "minimum transfer size" which is effectively a /24. This > causes ISP organizations to be approved for different initial block size > depending on if they first apply for a transfer directly under section 8 or > if they apply for a block under section 4. This policy is intended to > clarify this issue, by setting a consistent ISP initial IPv4 block size. It > was noted that ARIN staff current operational practice is to allow qualified > ISPs an initial /21 for Section 8 transfers when they first apply and are > approved under section 4. If an organization applies under section 8 first > they are initially qualified for a /24; larger allocations require additional > documentation as noted in 8.5.5. > > Policy statement: > > Replace section 8.5.4; > > 8.5.4. Initial block > > Organizations without direct assignments or allocations from ARIN qualify for > the transfer of an initial IPv4 block, a /24 for assignments or a /24 up to a > /21 for allocations. > > Comments: > > Timetable for implementation: Immediate > > Anything Else: > > The ARIN 40 Policy Experience Report is available at; > > Slides: > https://www.arin.net/vault/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_40/PDF/PPM/sweeting-policy-experience.pdf > > <https://www.arin.net/vault/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_40/PDF/PPM/sweeting-policy-experience.pdf> > > > Transcript: > https://www.arin.net/vault/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_40/ppm1_transcript.html#anchor_5 > > <https://www.arin.net/vault/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_40/ppm1_transcript.html#anchor_5> > > Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVsfVMG_6fA > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVsfVMG_6fA> > > Slides 10 - 13, located in the video from 6:30 to 8:30, are the relevant > portion of the report, questions from the audience follow. > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml> > Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any > issues. > > > > -- > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:[email protected] > <mailto:email%[email protected]> > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 > =============================================== > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
