Fully support the direction you are now taking this. Owen
> On Jan 20, 2018, at 9:16 AM, David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the burden is the potential to have to rejustify an ISP's initial > allocation when being fulfilled by transfer. The inconsistency seems > inefficient and creates confusion; there appears to be support for > eliminating the inconsistency. With slightly more support for changing > section 8 to be consistent with section 4, rather than the other way around. > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Scott Leibrand <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Quoting myself: > >> If there are organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24 for whom >> officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN) I’d like >> to understand what is burdensome, so we can figure out how to reduce that >> burden. If not, then implementing section 8 as written seems appropriate >> until we identify a reason to change it. > > > Do you know of any organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24 for > whom officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN)? > > Scott > > -- > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:[email protected] > <mailto:email%[email protected]> > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 > ===============================================
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
