That’s not what the new language actually says. Owen
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 13:26 , Paul McNary <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes > > /48 is the SWIP boundary. /48 is SWIP'ed. > /49 is not. > > Paul > > > On 7/20/2017 3:07 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> My recommendation was “shorter than /48” which would essentially mean the >> same thing. >> >> Owen >> >>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 15:46 , [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> The language of "b)" actually makes more sense with a /47: >>> >>> Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /47 or more addresses, or >>> subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be >>> registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which >>> meets the standards set forth in section 3.2. >>> >>> The major difference is that this language eliminates the SWIP requirement >>> for /48 blocks that are not announced, but all larger blocks require SWIP, >>> and blocks smaller than /48 are also exempt and of course also >>> non-routeable. >>> >>> This is best for those that think SWIP should be limited to only blocks >>> that are individually announced. I could go either way on this issue. >>> >>> Albert Erdmann >>> Network Administrator >>> Paradise On Line Inc. >>> >>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Leif Sawyer wrote: >>> >>>> Shepherd of the draft policy chiming in. >>>> >>>> Thanks for the lively discussion, everybody. There's certainly a lot to >>>> think about here. >>>> >>>> Just as a reminder to folk, the current policy under question is located >>>> here: >>>> https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six551 >>>> >>>> And, to help clarify some confusion, per 6.5.5.3.1 >>>> (https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six5531) >>>> residential customers "holding/64 and larger blocks" may use censored >>>> data, i.e. "Private Customer/Residence" >>>> in lieu of actual names and street addresses. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> With that said, I have a couple of questions to ask, based on potential >>>> rewrites that are brewing. >>>> >>>> First: Assuming a preference for /56 (based on PPML feedback) for the >>>> moment, which is the more >>>> preferential rewrite of the opening sentence of 6.5.5.1? >>>> >>>> >>>> a) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses >>>> shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed >>>> service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> b) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses, or >>>> subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be >>>> registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which >>>> meets the standards set forth in section 3.2. >>>> >>>> >>>> Second: Given your specific choice of A or B, are you preferentially >>>> inclined to choose the provided bit-boundary, or "/48" >>>> >>>> Third: If none of these options are palatable, do you have a proposed >>>> approach? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Leif Sawyer >>>> Advisory Council >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PPML >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >>> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
