On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:56:56 +0000 Richard J Letts <[email protected]> wrote:
Specifically: DMCA violation notices go to the SWIPed contacts instead of the original holder.
Sorry but that is only the theory. In practice they tend to go to the original holder. 80 to 90% of the DMCA notices I get are on addresses that are SWIPed and should be sent to the listed contacts but I have to handle them. (the other 10-20% I am the listed contact as all networks are SWIPed) What the DMCA complainant knows is that in almost all cases the SWIPed contacts has no knowledge of networking or DMCA issues. Other than for a small help in dealing with law enforcement and ARIN itself I consider the SWIP requirement a total waste of time. However as a good netizen and due to issues with ARIN when I requested additional ipv4 several years ago relative to /30 and /32 assignments we SWIP all assignments in v4 down to /32
/RjL From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Hannigan Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 7:58 PM To: Seth Mattinen <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6 Someone want to remind us all of what the "benefits" of SWIP are? Best, -M<
Larry Ash Network Administrator Mountain West Telephone 123 W 1st St. Casper, WY 82601 Office 307 233-8387 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
